January 31, 2026
A fund that aims to provide interest income with the potential for longer-term growth.
Is this fund right for you?
- You want investment income with the potential for long-term growth.
- You want to invest mainly in fixed-income funds with a smaller portion of Canadian and foreign equity funds (no more than 35 per cent).
- You're comfortable with a low to moderate level of risk.
RISK RATING
How is the fund invested? (as of December 31, 2025)
| Name | Percent |
|---|---|
| Domestic Bonds | 65.0 |
| Canadian Equity | 20.8 |
| US Equity | 9.5 |
| International Equity | 4.4 |
| Cash and Equivalents | 0.2 |
| Other | 0.1 |
| Name | Percent |
|---|---|
| Canada | 85.9 |
| United States | 9.5 |
| Multi-National | 4.2 |
| Ireland | 0.2 |
| Other | 0.2 |
| Name | Percent |
|---|---|
| Fixed Income | 65.0 |
| Financial Services | 7.9 |
| Technology | 6.5 |
| Exchange Traded Fund | 4.2 |
| Energy | 3.3 |
| Consumer Services | 2.7 |
| Basic Materials | 2.6 |
| Industrial Services | 2.3 |
| Utilities | 1.3 |
| Other | 4.2 |
Growth of $10,000 (since inception)
For the period 05/14/2012 through 01/31/2026 tr.with $10,000 CAD investment, The value of the investment would be $22,942
Fund details (as of December 31, 2025)
| Top holdings | Percent (%) |
|---|---|
| Canada Life Fixed Income (FT) | 65.0 |
| Canada Life International Equity Index ETF | 4.2 |
| Toronto-Dominion Bank | 1.2 |
| Royal Bank of Canada | 1.0 |
| Bank of Montreal | 0.8 |
| Brookfield Corp Cl A | 0.8 |
| NVIDIA Corp | 0.8 |
| Canadian National Railway Co | 0.7 |
| Apple Inc | 0.7 |
| Franco-Nevada Corp | 0.7 |
| Total allocation in top holdings | 75.9 |
| Portfolio characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Standard deviation | 6.02% |
| Dividend yield | 1.97% |
| Yield to maturity | - |
| Duration (years) | - |
| Coupon | - |
| Average credit rating | Not rated |
| Average market cap (million) | $715,601.2 |
Understanding returns
Annual compound returns (%)
| 1 MO | 3 MO | YTD | 1 YR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | 5.70 | 0.67 | 7.76 |
| 3 YR | 5 YR | 10 YR | INCEPTION |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.62 | 5.44 | 5.79 | 6.24 |
Calendar year returns (%)
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.34 | 10.08 | 10.23 | -8.63 |
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.88 | 8.48 | 11.74 | -1.57 |
Range of returns over five years (June 01, 2012 - January 31, 2026)
| Best return | Best period end date | Worst return | Worst period end date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.06% | May 2017 | 2.69% | Oct 2022 |
| Average return | % of periods with positive returns | Number of positive periods | Number of negative periods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.09% | 100 | 105 | 0 |
Q4 2025 Fund Commentary
Commentary and opinions are provided by Portfolio Solutions Group.
Market commentary
Global equities gained over the fourth quarter of 2025 and outperformed global bonds, which posted a small gain (all returns are in Canadian-dollar terms on a total-return basis). Stocks gained in large part due to the U.S. Federal Reserve Board (Fed) lowering interest rates over the quarter. However, returns were muted over concerns that artificial intelligence (AI) spending may be entering bubble territory.
The U.S. equity market advanced, posting a low-single-digit return. The health care sector was the strongest-performing sector. Canadian equities posted a gain and outperformed U.S. equities, getting a strong performance from the materials sector. EAFE equities advanced, underperforming Canadian equities but outperforming U.S. equities. Equities in the U.K. and Japan contributed to the performance of EAFE equities. Emerging markets equities also gained and slightly underperformed their developed market peers, with equities in Taiwan and India contributing to performance.
The FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index declined over the quarter. As government yields moved higher, government bond prices declined. Government bonds underperformed corporate bonds, which posted a small gain. Corporate bond prices benefited from narrowing credit spreads (the difference in yield between corporate and government bonds). Communication services sector bonds posted the largest increase in the corporate bonds sleeve. High-yield bond prices rose on a total-return basis and outperformed investment-grade corporate bonds.
The Bank of Canada, the Fed and the Bank of England lowered their policy interest rates. The European Central Bank held steady on its key interest rates, while the Bank of Japan raised its policy interest rate. The yield on 10-year Government of Canada bonds rose from 3.18% to 3.43%. Sovereign bond yields in the U.S., the U.K., Germany and Japan also increased.
Performance
Allocation to Franklin Templeton Core Bond contributed to performance as its off-benchmark exposures in the U.S. and credit exposures helped it outperform the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index over the quarter.
Allocations to Franklin Templeton Canadian Stock detracted from performance because of stock selection in the financials, materials and information technology sectors.
Portfolio activity
The portfolio manager did not make any change to the Portfolio during the quarter.
Outlook
In the portfolio manager's view, the final quarter of 2025 reinforced a stark divergence in global growth. The U.S. economy remains the anchor, with AI?driven productivity gains offsetting softer labour trends, while Canada, Europe and the U.K. continue to hover near stagnation.
Looking ahead, five forces shape the path into 2026. First, AI is delivering real?economy benefits even as equity leadership narrows and valuations stretch, increasing the risk that equity weakness spills into credit and tightens broader financial conditions. Second, China is stuck in low growth and persistent deflation, with policy focused on self?sufficiency and manufacturing scale over household demand, which exports disinflation through goods prices and keeps domestic yields anchored. Third, global trade remains fragmented as industrial policy, investment controls and regional supply chains reshape flows. This is an especially important watchpoint for Canada given sensitivity to U.S. policy and the North American trade framework review. Fourth, central banks are easing monetary policy cautiously, modestly in the U.S. and Canada, with more room in Europe and the U.K., while Japan may continue gradual tightening. Central banks may lean on liquidity operations or slower balance?sheet runoff to stabilize bond markets if conditions turn disorderly. Fifth, fiscal pressures are building, making policy credibility and refinancing capacity decisive for market pricing.
We believe equity markets still reflect optimism, particularly in the U.S., where AI?linked earnings support elevated multiples, but concentration and sentiment extremes raise caution flags. Commodities remain mixed, with structural demand supporting gold and oil softer on ample supply. Private?credit growth and funding?market functioning warrant close attention as potential transmission channels for stress.
Our focus remains resilience over precision, balancing U.S. exposure with broad diversification, maintaining liquidity and incorporating alternative income to navigate an environment where risks build quietly but can break suddenly.
We keep core U.S. equity exposure, while reducing dependence on narrow leadership through global diversification and multi?factor strategies, and by tilting toward domestic?demand and structural?growth themes less reliant on global trade flows. In fixed income, we pair high?quality duration with alternative income, such as private credit and mortgages, for yield and duration management, while elevating underwriting standards and liquidity buffers given potential vulnerabilities in private credit and the possibility of disorderly interest-rate moves.
Liquidity and flexibility remain central, allowing portfolios to absorb shocks tied to AI investment cycles, fiscal credibility shifts, bond?market volatility or trade?policy adjustments. Key risk monitors include equity?to?credit spillover, upside inflation surprises that slow the pace of easing, bond?market functioning, North American trade developments and fiscal signalling in high?refinancing jurisdictions.
A constructive upside remains in view. If AI?driven productivity gains broaden across services and diffuse internationally, inflation pressures would ease, real incomes would strengthen and fiscal dynamics would improve, an important scenario to capture in allocation and rebalancing plans even if it is not the base case.